YOU WERE LOOKING FOR :An Australian Tort Overview
Essays 61 - 90
Tort reform has been bantered about for decades. Court awards for punitive damages, pain, and suffering are...
operate a facilities maintenance company that includes four other employees, one of whom is a licensed plumber. The company pays t...
the US courts in regards to public schools : The authority of the public educational system finds its origin within a "constitutio...
can be used to help prevent another company from benefiting from Bugs efforts. 2. Industrial Espionage Corporate spying alw...
unlikely to be any argument for the case not to go ahead. However it is not always with a relationship, the proximity may be more ...
predicated on "knowledge". Indeed, that is often the case in the world of law. Lawsuits such as that noted above often involve s...
1. "Should the wronged party be compensated by the other party for the wrong"? If the answer to that question is yes,...
After working more than one consecutive shift, Matt was tired, left work and lost control of his vehicle, causing injury to himsel...
seen in the way the facts are interpreted. If we consider, whilst we are reading this, if the same interpretation would have been ...
imprisonment can be handed down by the court. The main aim of tort law is to provide a route to gain relief for...
case of White and Others (1998) supported a previous case of Dulieu v White and Sons (1901), which stated that where an individual...
This research paper discusses issues relevant to medical malpractice tort reform. The statutes of Oregon and Virginia are describe...
200 percent of the compensatory damages awarded" (Bamonte PG). Currently juries have plenty of room to award large damage claims ...
both pain and suffering and punitive damages. Hofmann (2003) believes that the Presidents: "... call for the reform of medical mal...
London Electricity Board (1965) cannot be seen as having an intention to create harm. This leads to the presence of fault through...
is safe from a clients legal right to sue. What is negligence, and why is it such a significant basis for judicial interjection? ...
to the attention of the reader. Abigail and the Tickets Abigal is the manger of the Room, the theatre that has contracted a st...
Under English law, a contract does not need to be written to be valid. If an agreement - either a written or oral one - can meet ...
the implications and recourse citizens have in regard to torts. What determines whether or not an individual seeks tort action an...
for breach of contract or its terms. Third parties were excluded due to both consideration and privity (McKendrick, 2000). It may ...
may also be seen to give the case strength, as injury to a blind person was foreseeable and action had not been taken to protect ...
result of their employment and the latter to personal relationships. Under common law, assault and battery can constitute ...
In six pages a student submitted case study is examined in terms of common law, specifically tort and contract law. Four sources ...
This was especially important at that time because the United States was very weak in its military sector, and would be unable to ...
well as the ethical nature of the situation. Recent findings indicate that humanistic risk management policies, where "proa...
the curb, jumps the sidewalk, crosses a parking lot, and slams into the booth, injuring the man inside. The injured man sues -- no...
Filming his mothers death could be seen as a decision driven by profit motive. Broadcast of the event on television or on the Int...
case, Buchanan had entered into an agreement to purchase a city residential lot, and to pay for it only if he were able to success...
The first aspect is to consider if a tort has occurred in the accident. to proceed we need to ensure that it is recognised for any...
laid down by legislation only. Land law appears complex in the way it is put together and the number of different courts or tribun...